
WHO Child Growth Standards Explained: What They Are and Why They Matter
The WHO Child Growth Standards are the global reference for how healthy children grow. Learn how they were developed, what they actually measure, and how doctors use them to assess your child's health.
Every time your pediatrician plots a weight or height measurement on a growth chart, they're comparing your child against a reference population. That reference is the foundation of everything in pediatric growth assessment — and for children under 2, that foundation is the WHO Child Growth Standards. Understanding what these standards are, how they were built, and what they actually measure will change how you read and interpret every chart, percentile, and growth conversation you have with your doctor.
The Problem the WHO Was Solving
Before 2006, pediatricians around the world used growth charts built from whatever population data was available locally. In the US, this meant the CDC growth charts — a set of reference charts last significantly updated in 2000, based on American children surveyed between 1929 and 1975.
The problem: these charts described how American children did grow — a mostly formula-fed population in a specific historical period. They were descriptive rather than prescriptive. A child who was breastfed might appear to fall off the CDC curve in the second half of the first year (breastfed babies naturally grow more slowly after 6 months) and trigger unnecessary medical concern — not because anything was wrong, but because the reference population grew differently.
The World Health Organization recognized this and set out to answer a different question: how do children grow when conditions are optimized? Not how do most children grow, but how should healthy children grow?
The MGRS Study: How the Standards Were Built
The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS), conducted between 1997 and 2003, was a landmark piece of research involving 8,440 children in six countries: Brazil, Ghana, India, Norway, Oman, and the United States.
The key design decisions that made this study different:
Children were selected, not just observed. Rather than measuring all children and reporting averages, the MGRS recruited children living in conditions designed to minimize growth-limiting factors. Participants lived in non-smoking households, had access to clean water and adequate food, had no significant health conditions, and were breastfed per WHO guidelines.
Breastfeeding was the norm. All MGRS children were breastfed for at least 12 months and fed complementary foods per WHO guidance. This is fundamental: the WHO charts treat breastfeeding as biologically normal and use it as the standard, not the exception.
Six countries were chosen deliberately. The multinational design tested whether children from very different genetic and geographic backgrounds grew similarly when raised under optimal conditions. The finding: they did. This was the empirical foundation for claiming the chart as a true standard — applicable globally — rather than a regional reference.
| Country | Why Included | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil (Pelotas) | South American diversity; tropical climate | Demonstrated standards apply across latitudes |
| Ghana (Accra) | Sub-Saharan African genetic diversity | Validated standards for African-heritage children |
| India (South Delhi) | South Asian diversity; large global population | Critical for validating South Asian applicability |
| Norway (Oslo) | Northern European reference comparison | Provided Caucasian European comparison point |
| Oman (Muscat) | Middle Eastern and Arab diversity | Broadened genetic representation |
| USA (Davis, CA) | Established the WHO gold standard breastfeeding norm in a developed country context | Anchored standards to Western pediatric practice |
Source: WHO MGRS Group (2006). Assessment of differences in linear growth among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
GrowthKit · Free for iPhone
Track every milestone, instantly.
What the Standards Include
The 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards publication includes charts and tables for:
| Indicator | Age Range | Clinical Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Weight-for-age | Birth to 5 years | Monitor overall weight gain; screen for undernutrition and obesity |
| Length/height-for-age | Birth to 5 years | Assess linear growth; detect stunting or excess height |
| Weight-for-length | Birth to 2 years | Body proportionality; independent of age |
| Weight-for-height | 2–5 years | Body proportionality for standing children |
| BMI-for-age | Birth to 5 years | Weight relative to height; nutrition assessment |
| Head circumference-for-age | Birth to 5 years | Brain growth monitoring |
| Arm circumference-for-age | 3 months to 5 years | Nutritional status, used in low-resource settings |
| Subscapular skinfold-for-age | 3 months to 5 years | Body fat distribution |
| Triceps skinfold-for-age | 3 months to 5 years | Body fat estimation |
Source: WHO Child Growth Standards, 2006. Available at who.int
The LMS Method: The Mathematics Behind the Chart
When your pediatrician's software or a growth tracking app tells you that your baby is at the "73rd percentile," that number comes from a specific mathematical process: the LMS method, developed by Tim Cole and incorporating work by several WHO biostatisticians.
Growth measurements in children are not normally distributed (bell-curved). Weight at age 6 months has a more complex distribution — skewed, with different variability at different points. The LMS method handles this by characterizing the distribution at each age with three parameters:
- L (Lambda): Accounts for the skewness of the distribution using a Box-Cox power transformation
- M (Mu): The median value
- S (Sigma): The coefficient of variation (spread)
Using L, M, and S values published for every age and sex in the WHO standards, any measurement can be converted to a Z-score (standard deviation from the median) and then to a percentile. This approach produces precise, clinically validated results — not approximations from lookup tables.
WHO vs. CDC: Practical Differences Parents Notice
The WHO and CDC charts can produce different percentile readings for the same child, particularly after 6 months. This isn't an error — it reflects the different populations each was built from.
The most practically significant difference: Weight-for-age in the second half of the first year.
Breastfed babies typically gain weight more slowly after 6 months compared to formula-fed babies. The CDC charts (built partly from formula-fed populations) can show a breastfed baby "dropping" when they're actually growing normally. The WHO charts, built from breastfed babies as the norm, don't generate this false alarm.
This is precisely why the AAP made its 2010 recommendation to use WHO charts for the first two years of life.
| Feature | WHO Standards (2006) | CDC Charts (2000) |
|---|---|---|
| Study design | Prescriptive: how children should grow | Descriptive: how US children did grow |
| Reference population | Multi-national (6 countries) | US National Survey data |
| Infant feeding norm | Breastfed as reference | Mixed breastfed/formula-fed |
| Age range (infant charts) | Birth to 5 years | Birth to 3 years for some charts |
| AAP recommended for | Birth to 2 years in the US | 2 years and older in the US |
| Global adoption | Used in 140+ countries | Primarily used in the US |
Source: WHO MGRS; AAP Policy Statement on WHO Growth Charts (2010)
Baby Weight Percentile Calculator
Calculate your baby's WHO weight percentile instantly — using the same LMS method used in clinical settings.
What "Normal Range" Actually Means
The WHO defines the normal growth range as the 3rd to 97th percentile — or in Z-score terms, -2 to +2 standard deviations from the median. This means that by mathematical definition, approximately 6% of completely healthy children will fall outside this range at any given measurement.
Being below the 3rd percentile is a threshold for investigation, not a diagnosis. Whether it's concerning depends on:
- The trend: Has the child always been at this percentile (likely familial), or did they cross multiple lines getting there?
- The whole picture: Are they meeting milestones, feeding well, alert and active?
- Family context: Parental height is the strongest predictor of child height
How Growth Standards Are Used Beyond Pediatrics
The WHO Child Growth Standards have applications well beyond individual well-child visits:
Global nutrition monitoring: The proportion of children under 5 below -2 Z-score for height-for-age (stunting) is a primary indicator in the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It's measured against the same WHO standards your pediatrician uses.
Clinical nutrition research: The standards are the reference used in clinical trials studying infant nutrition interventions worldwide.
Public health policy: Countries use the standards to set thresholds for food assistance programs and to monitor population health trends.
Pediatric medical software: EHR systems in pediatric practices worldwide use the WHO standards for the infant and toddler years.
The same charts behind a 2-minute conversation in a suburban pediatric office are behind global health policy affecting hundreds of millions of children. That context is worth understanding — not because it changes what a percentile means for your individual child, but because it tells you the reference you're looking at was built with extraordinary scientific rigor. To see these standards applied to your child's measurements, the baby growth chart by age shows WHO reference data in a practical format, and our pediatric growth chart online guide covers the tools available for tracking.
Baby Head Circumference Percentile Calculator
Track head circumference against WHO standards — the third measurement your pediatrician plots at every well-child visit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the WHO child growth standard?
The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) produced a set of growth standards published in 2006 that describe how children should grow under optimal conditions — breastfed, non-smoking households, adequate nutrition, and regular healthcare. Unlike previous charts built from observational data (how children do grow), WHO standards are prescriptive: they show how children can grow when conditions are ideal.
Does the US use WHO or CDC growth charts?
The AAP recommends using WHO growth standards for US children from birth to 2 years of age, and CDC growth charts for ages 2 and older. Most US pediatric practices follow this guidance, though some practices still use CDC charts throughout childhood. The key practical difference is that WHO charts are based on breastfed children as the norm, while older CDC charts were built from a mixed breastfed/formula-fed population.
What does the 50th percentile mean on the WHO growth chart?
The 50th percentile (also called the median) represents the measurement at which 50% of the reference population falls above and 50% falls below. A baby at the 50th percentile for weight at 4 months weighs exactly the median weight for healthy 4-month-old babies in the WHO reference population. Being anywhere from the 3rd to 97th percentile is considered within the normal range.
Why did the WHO develop new growth standards in 2006? What was wrong with the old ones?
The CDC growth charts in use before 2006 were based on observational data from a mostly formula-fed US population collected between 1929 and 1975. They described how American children did grow — not how they should grow under optimal conditions. WHO convened a multinational study specifically designed to establish a true growth standard, using children raised in conditions that minimized confounding factors like poor nutrition and formula feeding.
Medical Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult your child's pediatrician or a qualified healthcare provider for any health-related concerns.Free Tools
More Growth & Percentiles
Free Tools
More Growth & Percentiles